Review



2d diode array dose distribution mapcheck  (Sun Nuclear Corporation)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Sun Nuclear Corporation 2d diode array dose distribution mapcheck
    Absolute percent error against the measured dose for the <t>2D</t> <t>diode</t> detector and EPID. Error bars represent 1 SD. There was no significant (NS) difference.
    2d Diode Array Dose Distribution Mapcheck, supplied by Sun Nuclear Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/2d diode array dose distribution mapcheck/product/Sun Nuclear Corporation
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    2d diode array dose distribution mapcheck - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Intensity‐modulated radiation therapy dose verification using fluence and portal imaging device"

    Article Title: Intensity‐modulated radiation therapy dose verification using fluence and portal imaging device

    Journal: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

    doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5899

    Absolute percent error against the measured dose for the 2D diode detector and EPID. Error bars represent 1 SD. There was no significant (NS) difference.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Absolute percent error against the measured dose for the 2D diode detector and EPID. Error bars represent 1 SD. There was no significant (NS) difference.

    Techniques Used:

    Comparisons of the gamma passing rates (criteria: 3% global / 3 mm, 2% global / 2 mm) for the calculated dose distribution of the TPS and predicted dose distributions of the 2D diode detector and EPID, compared with the film measurement. Each bar indicates the mean gamma passing rate; error bars represent 1 SD. * = p < 0.02 , † = p < 0.04 , NS = not significant .
    Figure Legend Snippet: Comparisons of the gamma passing rates (criteria: 3% global / 3 mm, 2% global / 2 mm) for the calculated dose distribution of the TPS and predicted dose distributions of the 2D diode detector and EPID, compared with the film measurement. Each bar indicates the mean gamma passing rate; error bars represent 1 SD. * = p < 0.02 , † = p < 0.04 , NS = not significant .

    Techniques Used:

    Comparisons of dose differences for the planned dose distribution (a), and the predicted dose distributions of the 2D diode detector (b) and EPID (c). Comparisons of gamma distribution are also shown in (d), (e), and (f), respectively. Gamma index values of > 1 are shown in red.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Comparisons of dose differences for the planned dose distribution (a), and the predicted dose distributions of the 2D diode detector (b) and EPID (c). Comparisons of gamma distribution are also shown in (d), (e), and (f), respectively. Gamma index values of > 1 are shown in red.

    Techniques Used:



    Similar Products

    2d diode array dose distribution mapcheck  (Sun Nuclear Corporation)
    90
    Sun Nuclear Corporation 2d diode array dose distribution mapcheck
    Absolute percent error against the measured dose for the <t>2D</t> <t>diode</t> detector and EPID. Error bars represent 1 SD. There was no significant (NS) difference.
    2d Diode Array Dose Distribution Mapcheck, supplied by Sun Nuclear Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/2d diode array dose distribution mapcheck/product/Sun Nuclear Corporation
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    2d diode array dose distribution mapcheck - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Absolute percent error against the measured dose for the 2D diode detector and EPID. Error bars represent 1 SD. There was no significant (NS) difference.

    Journal: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

    Article Title: Intensity‐modulated radiation therapy dose verification using fluence and portal imaging device

    doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5899

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Absolute percent error against the measured dose for the 2D diode detector and EPID. Error bars represent 1 SD. There was no significant (NS) difference.

    Article Snippet: The other pattern was based on a dose comparison between the calculated TPS dose distribution and the measured 2D diode array dose distribution (MapCHECK; Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, FL).

    Techniques:

    Comparisons of the gamma passing rates (criteria: 3% global / 3 mm, 2% global / 2 mm) for the calculated dose distribution of the TPS and predicted dose distributions of the 2D diode detector and EPID, compared with the film measurement. Each bar indicates the mean gamma passing rate; error bars represent 1 SD. * = p < 0.02 , † = p < 0.04 , NS = not significant .

    Journal: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

    Article Title: Intensity‐modulated radiation therapy dose verification using fluence and portal imaging device

    doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5899

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparisons of the gamma passing rates (criteria: 3% global / 3 mm, 2% global / 2 mm) for the calculated dose distribution of the TPS and predicted dose distributions of the 2D diode detector and EPID, compared with the film measurement. Each bar indicates the mean gamma passing rate; error bars represent 1 SD. * = p < 0.02 , † = p < 0.04 , NS = not significant .

    Article Snippet: The other pattern was based on a dose comparison between the calculated TPS dose distribution and the measured 2D diode array dose distribution (MapCHECK; Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, FL).

    Techniques:

    Comparisons of dose differences for the planned dose distribution (a), and the predicted dose distributions of the 2D diode detector (b) and EPID (c). Comparisons of gamma distribution are also shown in (d), (e), and (f), respectively. Gamma index values of > 1 are shown in red.

    Journal: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

    Article Title: Intensity‐modulated radiation therapy dose verification using fluence and portal imaging device

    doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5899

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparisons of dose differences for the planned dose distribution (a), and the predicted dose distributions of the 2D diode detector (b) and EPID (c). Comparisons of gamma distribution are also shown in (d), (e), and (f), respectively. Gamma index values of > 1 are shown in red.

    Article Snippet: The other pattern was based on a dose comparison between the calculated TPS dose distribution and the measured 2D diode array dose distribution (MapCHECK; Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, FL).

    Techniques: